Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Richemont International SA et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations
as 0:2021cv62503
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S. and others
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations, MWM4 Store, MWM7 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Chanel, Inc. v. 2014 new fashion jewelry factory et al
as 0:2016cv60115
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
2014 new fashion jewelry factory, Adeline-hua, aeae and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lu et al v. Star Marianas Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
WeiLian Lu , Y. Ge , Xin Hong and others
Defendant:
Star Marianas Air, Inc., Marianas Air Travel, Tinian Transportation Management Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hengfa Shipping Incorporation v. Yi Da Xin (Hong Kong) Limited et al
as 1:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Hengfa Shipping Incorporation
Defendant:
Yi Da Xin (Hong Kong) Limited and Shaanxi Energy Metals & Minerals Resources Co. Ltd
Garnishee:
China Merchants Bank Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading Corporation
as 1:2008cv03754
Plaintiff:
Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. and Acoaxet Shipping PTE LTD
Defendant:
Yi Da Xin Trading Corporation (Philippines), Yi Da Xin Trading Co. Ltd. (Hong Kong), Yi Da Xin (Hong Kong) Limited and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Garnishee:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
