Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Yellow Corporation et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 6:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Yellow Corporation, YRC Inc. doing business as YRC Freight, USF Holland LLC and others
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee, Teamsters Local No. 696 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02648
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Southern Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. YRC, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02129
Plaintiff:
Southern Furniture Leasing, Inc.
Defendant:
YRC, Inc., Yellow Transportation, Inc. and Roadway Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Tyler v. Einspahr et al
as 2:2017cv02441
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Tyler
Defendant:
Richard Einspahr, YRC, Inc. and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kobilan et al v. Colter et al
as 6:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kobilan and Diana Kobilan
Defendant:
Derek A. Colter and YRC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. YRC Inc.
as 2:2016mc00224
Movant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Respondent:
YRC Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
