Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Liang et al v. Bioreference Laboratory, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Huimin Liang, Yu Jun Peng, Yuan Sang and others
Defendant:
Bioreference Laboratory, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Wang v. Garland
as 20-3524
Petitioner:
YAN LING WANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Signature Financial LLC v. USJL Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09331
Defendant:
Ai Yan Ling, Jing Zhang, -, USJL Express, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Signature Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Signature Financial and Leasing LLC v. USJL Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01930
Defendant:
Ai Yan Ling, USJL Express, Inc. and Jing Zhang
Plaintiff:
Signature Financial and Leasing LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abebe et al v. Wynn Las Vegas et al
as 2:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Yan Ling Chen, Justin Abea, Jing Qian-Galarotti and others
Defendant:
Wynn Las Vegas and Steve Wynn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Cesarz et al v. Wynn Las Vegas LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tina Lambert, Joseph Cesarz, Quy Ngoc Tang and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Joseph C Albanese, Mark Anthony Arboleda, Rosemarie Aromin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin v. Holder
as 12-2
Petitioner:
Yang Lin Lin, AKA Yan Ling Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 11-4401
Petitioner:
Zhongyong Chen, AKA Zhong Yong Chen, AKA Jian Li Chen and Yan Ling Li
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 11-285
Petitioner:
Zhongyong Chen and Yan Ling Li
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
