Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Singleton v. CMK Gaming International et al
as 2:2017cv01318
Plaintiff:
Claire Singleton
Defendant:
CMK Gaming International, Guanhuasoft Gaming, Tommy Cheng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Yang et al
as 2:2016mc00190
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Yang, Claudia Kano, Suncor Fontana and others
Receiver:
Stephen J. Donell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Mao et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2015cv00851
Plaintiff:
Rui Mao , Zhen Fan , Wenlan Huang and others
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Quartzburg Gold, ISR Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Pu et al v. Phillips
as 2:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
Hanxin Pu and Jailie Yang
Defendant:
Todd W. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yang v. University of Utah School of Medicine et al
as 2:2009cv00669
Plaintiff:
Yang Yang
Defendant:
University of Utah School of Medicine, Barbara C. Cahill, Jeffrey Botkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ClearOne Communications v. Yang et al
as 2:2007cv00832
Plaintiff:
ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications and others
Defendant:
Jun Yang, Wideband Solutions, Andrew Chiang and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang et al
as 2:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications and others
Defendant:
Andrew Chiang, Andrew Chiang, Andrew Chiang and others
Intervenor:
David Sullivan, David Sullivan and David Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
