Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Yellowstone to Uintas Connection, Alliance for the Wild Rockies and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Susan Eickhoff
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yellowstone to Uintas Connection et al v. Marten et al
as 9:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Yellowstone to Uintas Connection, Native Ecosystems Council and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Defendant:
Leanne Marten, Lisa Timchak, U.S. Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Vilsack et al
as 9:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council, Yellowstone to Uintas Connection and others
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, Randy Moore, Matthew Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, et al
as 23-35577
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDERNESS WATCH, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
Wilderness Watch et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 9:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Watch, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Gallatin Wildlife Association and others
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor Defendant:
Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8043
Petitioner:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8031
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
Wildlands Defense, et al. v. Brummett, et al.
as 1:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Wildlands Defense, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council and others
Defendant:
Tawnya Brummett, Randy Moore, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00174
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Petitioner:
J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 0:2020cv00234
Intervenor Defendant:
SOMMERS RANCH, LLC, State of Wyoming, MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO. and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, Western Watersheds Project and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
