Cases 41 - 50 of 575
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Charlie Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Swaney
as 2:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
Dustin Young
Defendant:
John R Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Swaney
as 1:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Dustin Young
Defendant:
John R Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Sunfield, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04271
Plaintiff:
Shantel Jenkins
Defendant:
Sunfield, Inc. and Keith Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dante Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Warden/Captain Nick Fisher, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Ludwig et al
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gibson
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Ludwig, John Doe, Kelly Riehle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Lamm et al v. Hall et al
as 5:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Megan K. Lamm and Haley M. Lamm
Defendant:
Judge Rosemarie A. Hall, Guardian ad Litem Nikki L. Reed, Attorney Susan J. Lax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03711
Plaintiff:
Brittany Young
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Columbus Life Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
William H. Young
Defendant:
Columbus Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
