Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Young v. Affranti
as 6:2024cv06172
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Young
Defendant:
Affranti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Department of Justice
as 9:2021cv00582
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00340
Respondent:
Heriberto Tellez, United States of America and Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn
Petitioner:
Troy Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Collado
as 1:2020cv02172
Respondent:
Jaifa Collado
Petitioner:
Michael Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Eckert
as 9:2019cv01243
Respondent:
Stewart Eckert
Petitioner:
Talarico Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GLADDEN v. YOUNG et al
as 9:2018cv01187
Respondent:
WARDEN S. YOUNG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Warden of FCI Raybrook
Petitioner:
DONALD LEON GLADDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv03933
Respondent:
Judicial Conference Committee, United States, Judicial Council Second Circuit and others
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility
as 1:2016cv01420
Petitioner:
Otis B. Young
Respondent:
Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Young
as 1:2015cv06011
Respondent:
William Phillips
Petitioner:
Anthony Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toilver v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2015cv00749
Plaintiff:
Samuel RasheenRay mond Toilver
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, County of Erie, Oliver C. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
