Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Viswanadha et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Rasagnya Viswanadha and Zimmer, Inc.
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1183 Immigration and Nationality Act
Zimmer Inc v. Howmedica Osteonics
as 3:2002cv00425
Plaintiff:
Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Technology Inc
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Mediator:
Terence P O'Shaughnessy
Counter_claimant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Counter_defendant:
Zimmer Technology Inc and Zimmer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
WILLIAMS v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07003
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KIRSCHNER v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07002
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE KIRSCHNER
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHAIKEN v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07000
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS and PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC, DEPUY, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv07001
Plaintiff:
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
