Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kim v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv01564
Plaintiff:
Hyeyun Kim
Defendant:
David Riddle, AIM Leasing Company, American Zurich Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Traylor v. Rosedale Transport Limited et al
as 1:2023cv03313
Plaintiff:
Raye Traylor
Defendant:
Rosedale Transport Limited, Zurich American Insurance Company, Harold Arthur Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Canty et al v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Canty, Johnny Cook, Betty Fambrough and others
Defendant:
Todd Daniels, Dimensionall Transportation LLC, American Zurich Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Streetman v. Riddle et al
as 1:2022cv02560
Plaintiff:
Danny Streetman
Defendant:
David Riddle, AIM Leasing Company, American Zurich Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Bradford v. Paul et al
as 1:2020cv05201
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance, Joe Paul, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ruth Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis et al v. Spinelli et al
as 1:2019cv00992
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company, Anthony Spinelli, PFG Transco, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davis and Duane PinKney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROCK et al v. ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES et al
as 7:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A BROCK and SUSAN G BROCK
Defendant:
ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES , MICHAEL JW NADEAU and Zurich Insurance Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROCK et al v. ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES et al
as 7:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A BROCK and SUSAN G BROCK
Defendant:
ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES , MICHAEL JW NADEAU and Zurich Insurance Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
