Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 529
Gerald Da'vage v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, et al
as 24-7043
Plaintiff: Gerald D. Da'Vage
Defendant: District of Columbia Housing Authority, Ronald McCoy, Paulette Campbell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
J-D. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff: S. J-D., SEAN DEWITT and RANITA JAIN
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Deon Colvin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, et al
as 24-7016
Plaintiff: Deon D. Colvin
Defendant: District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Joshua Deahl, Assoc. Judge, Roy W. McLeese, III, Assoc. Judge and others
Leroy Wells v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5021
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant: John Roberts, Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, D.S.G., U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerk, John Does, U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerks and others
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff: Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant: Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Michael Hurd, Jr. v. DC
as 23-7176
Plaintiff: Michael D. Hurd, Jr.
Defendant: District of Columbia, Government and District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03769
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03630
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?