Cases 1 - 10 of 1,309
Goodwin v. CIR
as 24-9003
Petitioner:
JENNIFER D. GOODWIN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al. *** REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.***
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Christopher J niekamp and Randall D. Hebrink
Defendant:
Watts Guerra, LLP, Bassford Remele, PA, Gustafson Gluek, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America et al v. Atomi Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, EMPOWER ADVISORY GROUP, LLC and Empower Retirement LLC
Defendant:
ATOMI FINANCIAL GROUP iNC d/b/a COMPOUND PLANNING, NATHAN BENGALI, WILLEM BLOEMSMA and others
Scofield v. Deeper Green Benefit LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Shane Scofield
Defendant:
Deeper Green Benefit LLC d/b/a Neighborhood Sun and Shared Solar Advisor USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gurewitz v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gurewitz
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Avantgarde Group S.P.A. v. Stock Loan Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Defendant:
Harvey L. Carmichael, Stock Loan Solutions, LLC, Joe D. Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Avantgarde Group S.P.A. and 1AF2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
