Cases 41 - 50 of 1,311
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tulsa Cement v. EPA, et al
as 23-9551
Petitioner:
TULSA CEMENT LLC, d/b/a Central Plains Cement Company LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Poe et al v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Peter Poe, Paula Poe, Patrick Poe and others
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Steven Katsis, Trevor Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. McKee et al
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
Defendant:
Gregory D. McKee, T & L Livestock, Inc., McKee Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Richard et al v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Richard and Darrius Richard
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC, d/b/a Unigroup Worldwide, Inc., Unigroup Worldwide Logistics, LLC, d/b/a Unigroup Logistics, Meramec Valley Transport, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Tulsa Cement LLC, et al v. EPA
as 23-9533
Petitioner:
TULSA CEMENT LLC, d/b/a Central Plains Cement Company LLC and REPUBLIC PAPERBOARD COMPANY LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Schnitzer v. Council Cafe LLC
as 5:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Ina Schnitzer
Defendant:
Council Cafe LLC doing business as Double D Saloon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
