Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hill v. Rudd, et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Rudd, F/N/U Porter and F/N/U Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxon v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Phillip Leslie Maxon
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff's Office, Rutherford County Jail and Dr. f/n/u Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trammell v. Rudd et al
as 3:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Chief (f/n/u) Fly and Dr. (f/n/u) Rudd
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montemayor v. Rudd et al
as 3:2019cv01087
Defendant:
Christopher Fly, f/n/u Rudd, f/n/u Humphries and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Benito Montemayor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novatne v. Rudd Medical et al
as 3:2019cv00748
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Melissa l/n/u, Rudd Medical, Doctor f/n/u Rudd and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Novatne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Rudd et al
as 3:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tucker
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Rudd, Rutherford County Jail, Rudd Medical Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Deauntai Pierce
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Robert Arnold, Medical Provider of Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Tollinson, et al
as 3:2016cv01943
Plaintiff:
James C. Johnson
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Tollinson, (f/n/u) Rudd and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilpatrick v. O'Rourke et al
as 3:2016cv01840
Plaintiff:
Michael Kilpatrick
Defendant:
James O'Rourke, (f/n/u) Rudd, Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bly v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott Bly
Defendant:
Truman Jones and (f/n/u) Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
