Cases 1 - 10 of 3,317
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wren v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11498
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wren
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle, JULIE ZEILER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
In Re Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2024cv11470
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Soderberg, Ray Peleckas, Michigan Laborers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cedric Francois, Federico Grossi and others
Petitioner:
Teddy J. Kasnicki and Kristen Bernard-Hedgespeth
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Quintero Castro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv11382
Plaintiff:
Edna M Quintero Castro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jiana v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2024cv30072
Plaintiff:
Ms. Tida Jiana
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M. JADDOU and Director Meghann Boyle
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
