Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03359
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03613
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chen v. Sushi 21 NY Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06153
Plaintiff: Jun Chen
Defendant: Sushi 21 NY Inc. and Shan Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05667
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv08322
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Shuyi Zhou and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chen et al v. Sun Sun Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02082
Plaintiff: Guo Shan Chen , Bing Miao Gap and Wing Fong Cheng Li
Defendant: Sun Sun Group, Inc. , Congee Bowery Restaurant and Bar, Inc. , Congee Village, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Li Chen v. U.S. Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-12025
Petitioner: LI SHAN CHEN
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
: SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04030
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chen v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02350
Plaintiff: Shan Chen
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Gregory L. Collett and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?