Social Security Cases filed in Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 764
Campagna v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00353
Plaintiff: Kevin Campagna
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lewers v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2023cv00627
Plaintiff: Timothy W. Lewers
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lawson Tucker v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv01051
Plaintiff: LaRhonda Gayle Lawson Tucker
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gardiner v. Commissioner of SSA
as 9:2023cv00200
Plaintiff: John David Gardiner
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Folkens v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff: James Lee Folkens
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crawford v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff: Michelle Crawford
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Conner v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv00751
Plaintiff: Debra Conner
Defendant: Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodrigues v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv00755
Plaintiff: Sandy Rodrigues
Defendant: Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keys v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00746
Plaintiff: Mary Jean Keys
Defendant: Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Flemett v. Commissioner of SSA
as 9:2023cv00109
Plaintiff: Amanda Gail Flemett
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?