Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rapid Enterprises, LLC v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-4041
Plaintiff:
RAPID ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, DBA Express One
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Workman v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-2033
Petitioner:
THOMAS WORKMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JASMINE MARTINEZ, ROBERT SALAS and others
Drew v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Courtney S Drew
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Thomas J Blum, Bernadette Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Thomas Workman and Unknown Persons
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Rufina (Perla) Sanchez, Jasmine Martinez and others
Respondent:
Unknown Pesons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
GOA v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
GOA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Rapid Enterprises v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Rapid Enterprises a Utah limited liability company doing business as Express One
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
NLRB v. United States Postal Service
as 21-9564
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Ford v. Brennan
as 21-4086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD O. FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Cole v. Brennan
as 21-5026
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY L. COLE
Ssebanakitta v. United States Postal Service
as 20-3242
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, (Nan Raymond)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FANNIE SSEBANAKITTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
