Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ningbo Jiaruisi E-Commerce Co., LTD v. Intersport Corp et al
as 1:2026cv10701
Plaintiff:
NINGBO JIARUISI E-COMMERCE CO., LTD
Defendant:
Intersport Corp d/b/a Wham-O and Wham-O Holding Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. Entity d/b/a BAISHENGBADAO on Amazon.com with Seller ID A168SDOIXT7SGX et al
as 5:2026cv07639
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp.
Defendant:
Entity d/b/a BAISHENGBADAO on Amazon.com with Seller ID A168SDOIXT7SGX, Entity d/b/a Bonrumia on Amazon.com with Seller ID A2T2PMZQFJ79DW, Entity d/b/a Buynowintl on Amazon.com with Seller ID AQNA5H2VVKKLR and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
WHAM-O Holding, LTD et al v. the individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv03719
Plaintiff:
WHAM-O Holding, LTD and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
the individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A, Arcade Sports, Harryoo and others
Debtor:
munxueningone
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
WHAM-O Holding, LTD et al v. the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv03575
Plaintiff:
Intersport Corp. and WHAM-O Holding, LTD doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
WHAM-O Holding, LTD et al v. the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv03572
Plaintiff:
WHAM-O Holding, LTD and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Aikangsenmaoyi, ANSOZLEE US and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
WHAM-O Holding, LTD et al v. the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv03573
Plaintiff:
WHAM-O Holding, LTD and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
WHAM-O Holding, LTD et al v. the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv03536
Plaintiff:
WHAM-O Holding, LTD and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
the Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. Arcade Sports et al
as 1:2025cv07300
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
Arcade Sports, iine, PupWonders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. anran-2021 et al
as 1:2025cv07318
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
fanlicheng-9, get2win, gogowd2018 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. 1688 Factory Direct Store Store et al
as 1:2025cv06784
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
1688 Factory Direct Store Store, 3GL02 3C Store, 77 & 11 Musical Instrument Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
