Cases 1 - 10 of 14,724
Ducksworth v. USA
as 2:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Ducksworth
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Terrell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Mark D. Terrell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Christian Johnson
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Derrick Nelson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Supreme Court of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Perry Jackson
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Probation Gulfport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Miss
as 3:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Terry E. Johnson, III
Respondent:
Miss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v Barnes
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Forrest Thomas, III
Respondent:
Timothy Barnes and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. Haley
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
Matt Haley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sellers v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Huffman
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Green
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
