Cases 51 - 60 of 159
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35509
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Rogue Riverkeeper, et al v. FERC
as 20-1171
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Oregon Women's Land Trust, Rogue Riverkeeper and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Central Oregon LandWatch et al v. Kovarik et al
as 2:2020cv00648
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, A. Shane Jeffries and Johanna Kovarik
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild and Central Oregon LandWatch
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Association of O&C Counties v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5011
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Oregon Wild and Soda Mountain Wilderness Council
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Association of O&C Counties
Association of O&C Counties v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5010
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Land Management, United States of America, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Oregon Wild, Soda Mountain Wilderness Council and Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Association of O&C Counties
American Forest Resource Coun v. USA, et al
as 20-5009
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, President of the United States of America, Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Oregon Wild, Soda Mountain Wilderness Council and Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Forest Resource Council
American Forest Resource Coun v. USA, et al
as 20-5008
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Land Management, United States of America, United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center and Oregon Wild
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Forest Resource Council
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 1:2019cv02069
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor Defendant:
Murphy Company
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 1:2019cv01810
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor Defendant:
Murphy Company
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Murphy Company, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-35921
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MURPHY TIMBER INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and MURPHY COMPANY, an Oregon corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
