Cases 121 - 130 of 825,676
Wilson v. Top 40 Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carla Wilson
Defendant:
Top 40 Express Inc. and Gregory Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. delivery.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
delivery.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. First Horizon Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
First Horizon Bank and Iberia Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. Cadence Bank
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v Cathay Bank
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Cathay Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Craghead v. EXACTECH, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
John Craghead
Defendant:
EXACTECH, INC. and EXACTECH U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
