Cases 31 - 40 of 251,141
In re Special US Attorney Michelle A. Jacobs
as 3:2024mc80110
Not Yet Classified:
Michelle A. Jacobs
Shah v. Hero Labs, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02777
Plaintiff:
Vishal Shah
Defendant:
Hero Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Special Attorney to the United States Attorney General Kevin T. Shaw
as 3:2024mc80111
Not Yet Classified:
Kevin T. Shaw
Coleman v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Serena Coleman
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc. and PFM Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Wood Ranch Moorpark, Inc. et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wood Ranch Moorpark, Inc., Wood Ranch Agoura LP, Wood Ranch Camarillo LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Meraz v. Pancho Villa's Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00822
Defendant:
Pancho Villa's Inc. doing business as Pancho Villa Farmer's Market also known as Pancho Villa Mercado, Pancho Villa Mercado and Invisipon, Inc. doing business as Sale-Fish.com
Plaintiff:
Graciela Meraz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jose Nunez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
