Cases 1 - 10 of 1,137
FITCHETT v. PETMED EXPRESS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY FITCHETT
Defendant:
PETMED EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
ETTAH v. VBIT MINING LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01788
Plaintiff:
LAWAL ETTAH
Defendant:
VBIT MINING LLC, ADVANCE MINING GROUP, VBIT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PIERCE et al v. KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
NATALIE PIERCE and MICHELLE INGRODI
Defendant:
KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BOBACK v. GEISLER et al
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOBACK
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. GEISLER, ESQ., MICHAEL A. DORUNDO and CYNTHIA M. DORUNDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
KOSSMAN et al v. BEEMSTERBOER
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
CURTIS KOSSMAN and MODERN WALL SYSTEMS, L.P. doing business as MODERN WALL SYSTEMS
Defendant:
BEAU BEEMSTERBOER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
DURHAM v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DURHAM
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Metzger v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Charles Metzger
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY and CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
REMUS v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN R. REMUS
Defendant:
AARON D. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Trust v. Wheels Up Towing & Recovery, LLC
as 2:2024cv01313
Plaintiff:
Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Trust and Daimler Title Co.
Defendant:
Wheels Up Towing & Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
