Cases 71 - 80 of 441,641
Ortega v. Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc.,
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smart v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Smart
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bryant v. Limestone County, Texas
as 6:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tometheus Bryant
Defendant:
Limestone County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Auth Token LLC v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Auth Token LLC v. Broadway Bancshares, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Broadway Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Campos et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Joana Campos, Silva Ortiz, I. V. L., MINOR and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Chavez v. Rebuilt Brokerage LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ananda Camargo Chavez
Defendant:
Rebuilt Brokerage LLC doing business as Rebuilt Realty and Rebuilt Offers LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Afshar Shandiz v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar Shandiz
Defendant:
State of Texas and Officer Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Lennie Collins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
