Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,814
Donald Freed v. Michelle Thomas, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff: DONALD FREED
Defendant: MICHELLE THOMAS and GRATIOT COUNTY, MI
Intervenor: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cynthia Lundeen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 24-3193
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA MAREK LUNDEEN
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Donald Freed v. Michelle Thomas, et al
as 24-1197
Plaintiff: DONALD FREED
Defendant: GRATIOT COUNTY, MI and MICHELLE THOMAS
Intervenor: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estate of Q.W., et al v. Lucas County Children Services, et al
as 24-3144
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF Q.W., By and with administrator, Jamie Redmond, as mother and natural guardian for, Q.W., and along with Quenton Whitsell, as father and natural guardian, JAMIE REDMOND, QUENTON WHITSELL and others
Defendant: LUCAS COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES, ROBIN REESE, Individually and as agent of Lucas County Children Services, KATRINA JONES, Individually and as agent of Lucas County Children Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5367
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mike Pop v. Brookfield Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc., et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff: MIKE POP
Defendant: BROOKFIELD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., a Michigan Corporation, GREGORY GUNTHER, ANDREW BEAM and others
Theodore Aleck, et al v. Havenpark Management, LLC, et al
as 24-1214
Plaintiff: THEODORE JAMES ALECK, DANIELLE TIA FRASER and TIA DANIELLE FRASER
Defendant: HAVENPARK MANAGEMENT, LLC and SPRINGBROOK ESTATES
Kenneth Lacey v. Department Of Veterans Affairs
as 24-5146
Plaintiff: KENNETH LACEY
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1325
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?