Cases 31 - 40 of 308,576
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jewell Vines v. Loandepot.com, LLC
as 8:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Tonia Jewell Vines
Defendant:
Loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sandford v. Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jason Sandford
Defendant:
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Paul Sapan v. CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC
as 8:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Defendant:
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Juron D. Ervin v. M. Leon et al
as 5:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Juron D. Ervin
Defendant:
M. Leon, O. Zamora-Rios, C. Romo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 8:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Corey Hernandez
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp and Nick Pirro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
