Cases 41 - 50 of 4,155
Boyatt v. Clay to Custom Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyatt doing business as Boyatt Design
Defendant:
Clay to Custom Construction, LLC, Arnold Clay Sindledecker and Cody Devin Nutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Wheels, LLC
as 1:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Wheels, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Fuss v. Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Fuss
Defendant:
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., Circle K Stores, Inc., City Hive Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
PacSec3, LLC v. BeyondTrust Corp.
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
PacSec3, LLC
Defendant:
BeyondTrust Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Covey v. Paris Laundry LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Troy Covey
Defendant:
Paris Laundry LLC, Kelsey Bucci and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Crisman v. Leadership Ministries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Chris Crisman
Defendant:
Leadership Ministries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
MINDEN PICTURES INC v. REHABMART LLC
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MINDEN PICTURES INC
Defendant:
REHABMART LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ScanComm LLC v. Block, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
ScanComm LLC
Defendant:
Block, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Dressler v. SECO Architectural Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Dressler
Defendant:
SECO Architectural Systems, Inc., Centria and Nucor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Omnitek Partners LLC v. Toto USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Omnitek Partners LLC
Defendant:
Toto USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
