Cases 61 - 70 of 20,060
Proffitt v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Geri A. Proffitt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GIORDANO v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W GIORDANO, SR
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hooks v. SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Amira K Hooks
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAGBEER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05817
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA RAGBEER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
AGUIRRE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
RICHARD AGUIRRE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BERNSTEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CAUDILL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA L. CAUDILL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
QUIGLEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T. QUIGLEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
QUIGLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T. QUIGLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MORAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05777
Plaintiff:
CHARISE M MORAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
