Cases 1 - 10 of 3,651
English v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael L. English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BOISVERT v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOISVERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. MINGS and REBECCA JANE MINGS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DEWITT v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MARIE DEWITT
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ENGLAND v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A.D. ENGLAND
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bowker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jenifer L. Bowker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GEORGE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
CEANN RAE GEORGE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Albaugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Albaugh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SPARKMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
ERIC R. SPARKMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
