Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Mayor & City Coucil of Baltimore v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zollicoffer v. Prince George's County Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Sonya Lancaster Zollicoffer
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Department, The Fraternal Order of Police, Major Art'z Watkins and others
Anne Arundel Co MD v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv03518
Plaintiff:
Anne Arundel Co MD
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Evernorth Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCarrell et al v. Betley
as 1:2023cv02781
Plaintiff:
Michael McCarrell and Mary Belinda Matthew
Defendant:
Michael P. Betley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
The Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 8:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland and The Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv03081
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Albert et al v. Global Tel*Link Corp. et al
as 8:2020cv01936
Plaintiff:
Ashley Baxter, Melinda Jabbie, Ashley Albert and others
Defendant:
3Cinteractive Corp., Global Tel*Link Corp. and Securus Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LMS Wellness, Benefit LLC v. iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01644
Plaintiff:
LMS Wellness, Benefit LLC
Defendant:
iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc., Greenmart of Maryland, LLC d/b/a Health for Life Baltimore, Budding Rose, Inc., d/b/a Health for Life Bethesda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dickson v. Hochul et al
as 8:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Paul Tonko, Michelle Hinchey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dickson v. Quad Graphics et al
as 8:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Quad Graphics, Clite Lameer, Chris Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
