Cases 11 - 20 of 10,111
Exergen Corporation v. Baxter International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11008
Plaintiff:
Exergen Corporation
Defendant:
Baxter International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Harding v. Costco
as 1:2024cv10981
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Costco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heinz v. Customer Contact Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv11001
Plaintiff:
Austin Heinz
Defendant:
Customer Contact Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Akram v. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 3:2024cv30034
Plaintiff:
Naila Akram
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff:
Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant:
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kline v. Primis Bank
as 1:2024cv10929
Plaintiff:
Robert Kline
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
