Cases 11 - 20 of 9,353
Grenell v. Troye
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Grenell
Defendant:
Olivia Troye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Dutt v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Aditi Dutt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dutt v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Aditi Dutt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kendrick v. O'Boyle
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Fredric Kendrick
Defendant:
Taylor O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Byrne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John M. Byrne, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Norman v. Barbeque Integrated, INC.
as 7:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Regina Norman
Defendant:
Barbeque Integrated, INC. doing business as Smokey Bones Bar and Fire Grill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Llarenas v. Jacobs Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jaime Llarenas
Defendant:
Jacobs Technology, Inc., Robert Rice, Thomas Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jeffrey v. INOVA Health Care Services et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
JULIANNE MARIE JEFFREY
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services and ANH-PHOUNG T LE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Unger v. INOVA Health Care Services et al
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MARC UNGER
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services and ANH-PHOUNG T LE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
