Cases 1 - 10 of 1,135
PIERCE et al v. KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
NATALIE PIERCE and MICHELLE INGRODI
Defendant:
KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
KOSSMAN et al v. BEEMSTERBOER
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
CURTIS KOSSMAN and MODERN WALL SYSTEMS, L.P. doing business as MODERN WALL SYSTEMS
Defendant:
BEAU BEEMSTERBOER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
DURHAM v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DURHAM
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
REMUS v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN R. REMUS
Defendant:
AARON D. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Trust v. Wheels Up Towing & Recovery, LLC
as 2:2024cv01313
Plaintiff:
Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Trust and Daimler Title Co.
Defendant:
Wheels Up Towing & Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dinardo v. General Motors LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dinardo
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Onstar LLC and Lexisnexis Risk Solutions INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MANN et al v. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER MANN and ELENI KATZ
Defendant:
BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CARMELITE NOISETTE OXCEVA et al v. JEAN E. NOEL et al
as 2:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
CARMELITE NOISETTE OXCEVA and WESLAIRE HENRY OXCEVA
Defendant:
JEAN E. NOEL and MADIANITE MARCELLUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ZHANG v. DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO. et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
JEFF BAOLIANG ZHANG
Defendant:
DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO., MICHAEL KNAPP and VICKIE KOWALECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
