Cases 41 - 50 of 749
Malo et al v. Performance Health Technology, Ltd.
as 6:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Katelin Malo, Corrinna Reed and Joann Kindred
Defendant:
Performance Health Technology, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Ramani v. CD Baby
as 3:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Valmiki D. Ramani
Defendant:
CD Baby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Sisco v. Hotovec et al
as 6:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Micheal Sisco
Defendant:
Micah G Hotovec and Kitty Wertz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
:rita,: kartalyan@beneficiary v. Clark et al
as 6:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
irita,: kartalyan@beneficiary and :rita, :kartalyan@beneficiary
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Jeri Bassett and Jeff Stenman
Calhoon v. Cochran et al
as 6:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
E. Calhoon
Defendant:
John Cochran and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. NWESTCO LLC
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Defendant:
NWESTCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
VanDyke et al v. Norcold, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Phillip Kyle VanDyke, Maureen Elaine VanDyke, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Norcold, Inc. and Thetford Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. MAPPI America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MAPPI America, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROES 1 through 10 and Ideal Vibration LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Balcom et al v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Balcom, Mary Barnes and Larry Balcom
Defendant:
April Peterson, Clinton Peterson and Foreclosure Help, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
