Cases 71 - 80 of 188
Hunter v. Midland Mortgage
as 16-6012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDLAND MORTGAGE, a division of Midfirst Bank
Vickroy v. Vickroy, et al
as 16-2001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOHN VICKROY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ANN VICKROY, THELMA JEAN VICKROY, NICHOLAS KIRKPATRICK and others
BNSF Railway v. C.A.T. Construction, et al
as 15-6230
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMPSON LOGISTICS, L.L.C.
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
C.A.T. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Breen v. Pruter, et al
as 15-8132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESIA RENEE BREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DORCY RUSSELL PRUTER, a California resident and DORCY INC.
Mud Operations v. SJL Well Service
as 15-6204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUD OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SJL WELL SERVICE, LLC
Adema Technologies v. Imaginit, et al
as 15-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADEMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a Gloria Solar (USA)
Defendant - Appellee:
IMAGINIT, INC. and PATRINA EIFFERT
Reality Technology, et al v. United States
as 15-1366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REALITY TECHNOLOGY, INC., IVAN DRINKS, SR. and IVAN DRINKS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kirby, et al v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, et al
as 15-5089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELBERT KIRBY, JR. and CALEB MEADOWS
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, RESMAE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Dobbins, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 15-6150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT DOUGLAS DOBBINS, JERREMY SCOTT DOAK, HOLLY LYNN DOAK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, LARRY DOBBINS, individually and as trustee for the K.D. Dobbins Trust dated January 29, 1992, LINDA DOBBINS and others
Lane v. Lane, et al
as 15-8092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT M. LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
VIKKI L. LANE, BRUCE GLESBY, MARISA BEUOY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
