Cases 71 - 80 of 231
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC., et al v. GAUBATZ et al
as 1:2009cv02030
Defendant:
CHRIS GAUBATZ, PAUL DAVID GAUBATZ, DAVID MARSHALL and others
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS, CAIR-FOUNDATION, INC. and COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KEITA v. ROYAL AIR MAROC
as 1:2018cv01419
Plaintiff:
BANGALY KEITA
Defendant:
ROYAL AIR MAROC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
KAMYANS, et al v. POPPITI
as 1:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
SAM KAMYANS , AMANDA KAMYANS and PETROLEUM MUTUAL RESERVE DEFICIENCY FUND, LLC
Defendant:
VINCENT POPPITI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. KINGDOM OF SWEDEN et al
as 1:2018cv01133
Plaintiff:
ROY TAYLOR
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SWEDEN and NATIONAL MUSEUMS OF WORLD CULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2018cv01131
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: TEMPORARILY OUT OF ORDER
KRUKAS v. AARP et al
as 1:2018cv01124
Plaintiff:
HELEN KRUKAS
Defendant:
AARP, AARP SERVICES INC. and AARP INSURANCE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF TIGEST D. TESFAWE v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv00682
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and SCOT LEE MUNTZ
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF TIGEST D. TESFAWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
WARD v. FOX 5 DC
as 1:2018cv00565
Plaintiff:
LARON WARD
Defendant:
FOX 5 DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
HAN v. FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY SERVICE
as 1:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
KAREN C. HAN
Defendant:
FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
