Cases 81 - 90 of 494
Fitzl et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
Susan Fitzl and Samantha Horton
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sahm v. Sahm et al
as 2:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Teri Kealoha Sahm
Defendant:
Teri K Sahm and Teri Sahm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Tacoma Avenue Investors LLC v. Bank of the West
as 2:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Tacoma Avenue Investors LLC
Defendant:
Bank of the West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Loo et al v. Hamerslag et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Loo David, David Loo, Sarah Loo and others
Defendant:
Andersen Tax LLC and Steven Hamerslag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Baron et al v. Amazon Inc
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Mary Baron, Calhea Johnson, Malika McLean and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Annis v. Annis et al
as 2:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant:
Jeremy D Annis, Kelli Hall and Machelle L Sherels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Khoo v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Philip Khoo
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0101 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Harper v. Dick Hannah Toyota et al
as 3:2022cv05065
Plaintiff:
John Harper
Defendant:
Dick Hannah Toyota and Toyota Motor North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Jallow v. Wells Fargo & Co et al
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Yaya Jallow
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Co and EAN Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Clark
as 3:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert L Clark, Jr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunctions Against Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
