Cases 1 - 10 of 6,345
Eli Porter, et al v. Derrell Thigpen, et al
as 24-11373
Plaintiff:
ELI PORTER, MICHAEL SINGLETON, TIMOTHY VAN BEVERHOUDT and others
Defendant:
DERRELL THIGPEN, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's, MATT SOWELL, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's, JONATHAN MALONE, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's and others
Angela Nails v. State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11331
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CARRIER, ANDREW HAMLIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crystal Maye v. Brevard County Tax Collector, et al
as 24-11344
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MAYE
Defendant:
BREVARD COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, OCEAN TAX DEED INVESTMENT, LLC. and BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Ling Cui v. USA, et al
as 24-11286
Plaintiff:
LING CUI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Jesus Rivera, et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 24-11311
Plaintiff:
JESUS RIVERA, SIAKA MASSAQUOI, GREGORY PURDY, JR. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DIRECTOR OF F.B. I., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
Edward Osborne v. PNC Bank, et al
as 24-11200
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. OSBORNE
Defendant:
PNC BANK, YOUNG BOOZER and TONY S. ALLEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
