Cases 31 - 40 of 3,342
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE EL v. MARTINEZ-THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
MICHELLE MARTINEZ-THOMAS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COLORADO and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE EL v. PINNACOL ASSURANCE et al
as 1:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PINNACOL ASSURANCE, EXCEL PERSONNEL INC., TRANSPARENT TECHNOLOGIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRAXTON v. ROPER
as 1:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
CPL. ROPER and ROPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L. BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv03274
Plaintiff:
RHONDA FLEMING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND and COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv02753
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. SEPE et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
LOUIS SEPE, LACBA IDP, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
IRY JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
