Cases 41 - 50 of 3,795
Livingston v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Tulsa Police Department and Police/Fire/Emergency Dispatch - 911
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle-Giles v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viers v. Shriner et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lyn Viers
Defendant:
Dr FNU Shriner and Mental Health Prescriber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyers v. Cleveland County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Grady County Medical
as 5:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Johnson
Defendant:
Grady County Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Lilly et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Alexis McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Lilly, Garfield County Detention Center and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
