Civil Rights Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,322
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff: Sidney V. Newton
Defendant: Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Hapo Community Credit Union et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff: Paul Dawson
Defendant: Hapo Community Credit Union and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassman v. Braun et al
as 6:2024cv00705
Plaintiff: Brandon C. Glassman
Defendant: Mark Braun, Bobbie France, Tina Lovik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Cheremonv et al
as 6:2024cv00690
Plaintiff: Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant: Alexandra Cheremonv and Drake Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff: Johnathan R. Black
Defendant: Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff: Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant: C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lopez v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff: Ricardo Constantino Lopez
Defendant: Erin Reyes, T. Hudson, Patrick Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. CNN et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: CNN and Fox News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Corrections Enterprise
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: Oregon Corrections Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00653
Plaintiff: David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant: Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?