Cases 1 - 10 of 19,596
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jenkins v. Temple Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamall Jenkins
Defendant:
Temple Police Department, Bell County District Attorney and Bell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Andrews et al
as 5:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Terry Andrews, E.R. Delta 4 Bunk 47, Walle Delta 4 bunk 41 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Tyroch et al
as 6:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Christopher Jenkins
Respondent:
Melissa Tyroch and Steve Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Isaac Cardenas
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calhoun v. Smalls et al
as 6:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
Officer FNU Smalls and OIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
