Cases 91 - 100 of 154
Boucher v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation
as 1:2008cv10358
Plaintiff:
Allison J. Boucher
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loan Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Veira v. Saxon Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2008cv10302
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Veira
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Dominguez v. WMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv10222
Plaintiff:
Juana M. Dominguez
Defendant:
WMC Mortgage Corporation, Saxson Mortgage Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Tenney et al v. First NLC Financial Services, LLC
as 4:2007cv40307
Plaintiff:
George Tenney, III, Richard J. Scotti, Thomas M. Motyka and others
Defendant:
First NLC Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rodrigues v. Delta Funding Corporation
as 1:2007cv12037
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodrigues
Defendant:
Delta Funding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Cain v. E-Loan, Inc.
as 1:2007cv12040
Plaintiff:
John T. Cain
Defendant:
E-Loan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Contois v. Chase Home Finance LLC
as 1:2007cv12025
Plaintiff:
Paul Contois
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Howard et al v. Washington Mutual Bank
as 1:2007cv11982
Plaintiff:
Halem Howard and Katherine Howard
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Pizzi et al v. E-Loan Inc.
as 1:2007cv11955
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Pizzi and Denis B. Doherty
Defendant:
E-Loan Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Woodbury et al v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company
as 1:2007cv11954
Plaintiff:
Katherine Woodbury, James Jones, Sylvia Jones and others
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
