Cases 91 - 100 of 1,048
CONSUMER FUELS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FUELS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
ATECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ALBERICI MASSMAN LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01882
Plaintiff:
ALBERICI MASSMAN LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
OCCI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SIXGEN, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01827
Plaintiff:
SIXGEN, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
HUNTER STRATEGY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ACCELGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
ACCELGOV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
ASRC FEDERAL CYBER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
INSIGNIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01770
Plaintiff:
INSIGNIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
COMPUTER WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ALLICENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
ALLICENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
COMPUTER WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Honeywell International Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC. and METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
ASRC FEDERAL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
ASRC FEDERAL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
OSI VISION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TOGIAK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
TOGIAK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SAFAL PARTNERS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
SAFAL PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
THE MANHATTAN STRATEGY GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.