Cases 91 - 100 of 355
JACKSON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv01262
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. JACKSON and PATRICIA G. JACKSON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and WELLS FARGO INSURANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LAVERTY v. CHASE CORPORATE OFFICE HQ
as 2:2012cv04391
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W. LAVERTY
Defendant:
CHASE CORPORATE OFFICE HQ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KAPLAN v. KIRK
as 2:2012cv01097
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. KAPLAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. KIRK , BARABRA JOAN TUENNERMAN and HENRY W. TUENNERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Redding v. LVNV Funding, LLC. et al
as 1:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Donna Redding
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC. , Edwin A. Abrahamsen & Associates, Edwin A. Abrahamsen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rupp et al v. Resurent Capital Services, LP
as 1:2011cv02051
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Rupp and Jody Susan Rupp
Defendant:
Resurent Capital Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SNYDER v. MEYER DARRAGH BUCKLER BEBENEK & ECK PLLC et al
as 2:2011cv01053
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
MEYER DARRAGH BUCKLER BEBENEK & ECK PLLC and LEE R. DEMOSKY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HINTON v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv04419
Plaintiff:
DONNA HINTON
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
LEE v. SUZUKI OF PLYMOUTH MEETING et al
as 2:2011cv04109
Plaintiff:
JENEE LEE
Defendant:
SUZUKI OF PLYMOUTH MEETING, JOSEPH RAMOS, SANTANDER CONSUMER UISA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GREEN v. CREDITORS INTERCHANGE et al
as 2:2011cv02990
Plaintiff:
JOHN B. GREEN
Defendant:
CREDITORS INTERCHANGE , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z, CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MORRIS v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
DESIREE MORRIS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. and WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
