Cases 91 - 100 of 17,730
Herrera v. Hainsworth et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Herrera
Respondent:
Superintendent Hainsworth and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovejoy v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Alex Leroy Lovejoy
Respondent:
Melinda Adams and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanco v. Talutto et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Victor Blanco
Defendant:
Talutto, Pigga and Jason Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sainiak v. Newberry et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Garrett Raymond Sainiak
Defendant:
Newberry, Rainer, A. Webrzynowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise v. U.S.A.
as 1:2024cv00526
Petitioner:
Jaycee Wise
Respondent:
U.S.A. and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopherson v. Gourley et al
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Charles Christopherson
Respondent:
Michael Gourley and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashford, Jr. v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Corey Dickerson, Deputy Warden Ray and Deputy Warden Levalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanutti-Spencer v. Nicolas
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Maria Sanutti-Spencer
Defendant:
Wendy Nicolas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shears v. Lytle et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
J. Lytle, John Doe and Lieutenant Stabley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Taji Abdullah
Defendant:
Gregory Briggs, Roger Lucas, Bruce Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
