Cases 91 - 100 of 13,001
Shumaker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05017
Plaintiff:
Donna Fay Shumaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Trenton J. Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Serocke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Courtney Serocke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hardy v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Hardy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Friesz v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Mike Loren Friesz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gartner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Carrie Gartner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Joshua v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joshua Peter Gonzales
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Clarke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Rodee Clarke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Merrill v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jack Anthony Merrill
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
