Cases 91 - 100 of 16,233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Humpleby v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03568
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hailes v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hailes
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. et al. v. Wang et al.
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. and Suzhou Youtou Cornerstone Enterprise Management Center, L.P.
Respondent:
Chan Qian Wang and Hao Zhou
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Whitman v. U.S. Development Corp.
as 5:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Whitman
Defendant:
U.S. Development Corp. doing business as Akro-Plastics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Slone et al. v. Transworld Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Wendy Slone and Jacob Slone, Jr.
Defendant:
Transworld Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
