Cases 101 - 110 of 269
Petrocco Farms, Inc. v. Gourmet Home Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00383
Defendant:
Gourmet Home Foods, Inc. and Srikanth Kandalam
Plaintiff:
Petrocco Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
First Cut Produce, Inc. v. Supreme Harvest, LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
First Cut Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Supreme Harvest, LLC, Adrian R. Bazan, Efrain T. Barbosa and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Palmer Watermelon Farms Inc v. US Department of Agriculture
as 3:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
Palmer Watermelon Farms Inc
Defendant:
US Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181
FILING ERROR
as 6:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Lipman - Texas, LLC, d/b/a Combs Produce
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Lipman - Texas, LLC v. Heart of Texas Produce, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00023
Defendant:
Heart of Texas Produce, Inc. and Harold R. Knight
Plaintiff:
Lipman - Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
American Fresh Produce LLC v. Logan et al
as 3:2014cv04379
Plaintiff:
American Fresh Produce LLC
Defendant:
LRCSL LLC
Intervenor_plaintiff:
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Taylor Farms Texas Inc v. LRCSL LLC et al
as 3:2014cv04208
Plaintiff:
Taylor Farms Texas Inc
Defendant:
LRCSL LLC, Lance Logan and Michael Schumacher
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Smith & Rohdenski Inc v. LRCSL LLC et al
as 3:2014cv03929
Plaintiff:
Smith & Rohdenski Inc
Defendant:
LRCSL LLC and Lance Logan
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Boschi v. IZAGUIRRE
as 3:2014cv00331
Petitioner:
Frederico Boschi
Respondent:
LISANDRA IZAGUIRRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11607
Central Produce Distributors, Inc. v. Margret C. DeBruyn
as 7:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Central Produce Distributors, Inc.
Defendant:
Margret C. DeBruyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
