Cases 101 - 110 of 12,857
Damrell v. Richmond PD et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Derick Damrell
Defendant:
Richmond PD, Richmond Sheriffs Department and Madison County DPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. USA
as 1:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Adrian Nolan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Grimes v. Jackson County Detention Center et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Executor:
Ronda Grimes
Defendant:
Jackson County Detention Center, Jackson County, Kentucky, Brian Gabbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
City of Covington, Rob Sanders, Donald Buring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Adam L. Lee
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Weathers v. Via Path
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Weathers
Defendant:
Via Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Logan County Detention Center Jail
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Steve D. Roberson
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
